Barr Body: Difference between revisions

From The School of Biomedical Sciences Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Nnjm2 (talk | contribs)
Cleaned up the references. Cleaned up the text.
 
(23 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
A '''Barr Body '''is an inactivated. condensed X [[Chromosome|chromosome]] found in female cells.  
A Barr Body is an inactivated, condensed X [[Chromosome|chromosome]] found in female cells.  


Since X chromosomes are larger than [[Y_chromosome|Y chromosomes]], they could potentially hold more genetic information. To ensure that X-linked gene product doses are kept similar between males and females, one of the [[X_chromosome|X chromosomes ]]in a female is crammed into a small space which condenses (the Barr Body). This results in the genetic information on the chromosome being inaccessible to proteins that cause gene transcription. This is called ''dosage compensation''.  
Since females possess two X chromosomes and males have one X chromosome and a [[Y chromosome|Y chromosomes]], Barr bodies are essential to regulate the amount of X-linked gene product being transcribed. To ensure that X-linked gene product doses are kept similar between males and females, one of the [[X chromosome|X chromosomes]] in a female becomes very condensed - the Barr body. This results in the genetic information on the chromosome being inaccessible to proteins that cause [[Gene|gene]] transcription. This is called [[Dosage Compensation Mechanism|dosage compensation]].  


Inactivation of the X chromosome is random and occurs at an early point of development.  
[[X chromosome Inactivation|X chromosome Inactivation]] is random and occurs at an early point of development, however, about 10% of the genes on the inactivated X chromosome avoid being silenced<ref>Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K and Walter P (2008) Molecular Biology of The Cell, 5th edition, New York: Garland Science</ref>.  


The number of Barr bodies in a cell is one less than the number of X chromosomes.  
The number of Barr bodies in a cell is one less than the number of X chromosomes. For example:


''e.g''.&nbsp;In a normal female with the genotype 46XX , the number of Barr bodies would be 1.<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; In a normal male with the genotype 46XY, the number of Barr bodies would be 0.  
*In a normal female with the [[Genotype|genotype]] 46XX , the number of Barr bodies would be 1.  
*In a normal male with the genotype 46XY, the number of Barr bodies would be 0.


&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;However in a male with [[Klinefelter syndrome|Klinefelter's syndrome and]] the genotype 47XXY, the number of Barr bodies would also be 1.<ref>Page 262, Hartl D.L and Ruvolo M (2012) Genetics, Analysis of Genes and Genomes, 8th edition, USA: Jones and Bartlett</ref>  
However in a male with [[Klinefelter syndrome|Klinefelter's syndrome]] (where the genotype is 47XXY), the number of Barr bodies would also be 1<ref>Page 262, Hartl D.L and Ruvolo M (2012) Genetics, Analysis of Genes and Genomes, 8th edition, USA: Jones and Bartlett</ref><ref>Alberts, B. Johnnson, A. Lewis, J. Raff, M. Roberts, K and Walter, P. (2008) Molecular Biology of The Cell 5th Edition, New York:Garland Science. (page 473)</ref>.


<br>
To work out the number of Barr bodies an individual has the formula: Xn-1 can be used.


Reference  
=== Lyonization  ===
 
Lyonization was discovered by British geneticist Mary Lyon when she found that chromosome sets with more than one X chromosomes undergo X-inactivation. She consequently came up with the Lyon Hypothesis of which her discovery is based.
 
This is a conservative method in which an X chromosome is shut down, in order to form a Barr body. Lyonization is the process where the chromosome is compacted into a small, dense Barr body. Here most of the genes are inactivated so that they are not transcribed.
 
Lyonization allows human females to have the usual 'dosage' of genes as males; males already have fewer genes due to the presence of the Y chromosome which is smaller than the X chromosome; females have two XX chromosomes<ref>X-inactivation. Khan Academy. https://www.khanacademy.org/science/high-school-biology/hs-classical-genetics/hs-sex-linkage/a/x-inactivation</ref>.
 
The Lyon Hypothesis:
 
*Inactivation is random at an early point in development
*Once inactivated, all progeny cells have the same X-chromosome inactivated
 
=== '''Non-coding RNA and X inactivation''' ===
 
The inactivation process is controlled by 2 genes: Xist and Tsix ( which if you noticed are the opposites of each other)
 
Xist is only expressed in cells containing 2 X chromosomes( females) and it has the ability to recruit various silencing proteins to mark the future non-coding X chromosome<ref>Penny, G. D., et al. Requirement for Xist in X chromosome inactivation. Nature 379, 131–137 (1996) doi:10.1038/379131a0</ref>.
 
=== Reference ===


<references />
<references />

Latest revision as of 06:51, 5 December 2018

A Barr Body is an inactivated, condensed X chromosome found in female cells.

Since females possess two X chromosomes and males have one X chromosome and a Y chromosomes, Barr bodies are essential to regulate the amount of X-linked gene product being transcribed. To ensure that X-linked gene product doses are kept similar between males and females, one of the X chromosomes in a female becomes very condensed - the Barr body. This results in the genetic information on the chromosome being inaccessible to proteins that cause gene transcription. This is called dosage compensation.

X chromosome Inactivation is random and occurs at an early point of development, however, about 10% of the genes on the inactivated X chromosome avoid being silenced[1].

The number of Barr bodies in a cell is one less than the number of X chromosomes. For example:

  • In a normal female with the genotype 46XX , the number of Barr bodies would be 1.
  • In a normal male with the genotype 46XY, the number of Barr bodies would be 0.

However in a male with Klinefelter's syndrome (where the genotype is 47XXY), the number of Barr bodies would also be 1[2][3].

To work out the number of Barr bodies an individual has the formula: Xn-1 can be used.

Lyonization

Lyonization was discovered by British geneticist Mary Lyon when she found that chromosome sets with more than one X chromosomes undergo X-inactivation. She consequently came up with the Lyon Hypothesis of which her discovery is based.

This is a conservative method in which an X chromosome is shut down, in order to form a Barr body. Lyonization is the process where the chromosome is compacted into a small, dense Barr body. Here most of the genes are inactivated so that they are not transcribed.

Lyonization allows human females to have the usual 'dosage' of genes as males; males already have fewer genes due to the presence of the Y chromosome which is smaller than the X chromosome; females have two XX chromosomes[4].

The Lyon Hypothesis:

  • Inactivation is random at an early point in development
  • Once inactivated, all progeny cells have the same X-chromosome inactivated

Non-coding RNA and X inactivation

The inactivation process is controlled by 2 genes: Xist and Tsix ( which if you noticed are the opposites of each other)

Xist is only expressed in cells containing 2 X chromosomes( females) and it has the ability to recruit various silencing proteins to mark the future non-coding X chromosome[5].

Reference

  1. Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K and Walter P (2008) Molecular Biology of The Cell, 5th edition, New York: Garland Science
  2. Page 262, Hartl D.L and Ruvolo M (2012) Genetics, Analysis of Genes and Genomes, 8th edition, USA: Jones and Bartlett
  3. Alberts, B. Johnnson, A. Lewis, J. Raff, M. Roberts, K and Walter, P. (2008) Molecular Biology of The Cell 5th Edition, New York:Garland Science. (page 473)
  4. X-inactivation. Khan Academy. https://www.khanacademy.org/science/high-school-biology/hs-classical-genetics/hs-sex-linkage/a/x-inactivation
  5. Penny, G. D., et al. Requirement for Xist in X chromosome inactivation. Nature 379, 131–137 (1996) doi:10.1038/379131a0