Barr Body: Difference between revisions

From The School of Biomedical Sciences Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Nnjm2 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Nnjm2 (talk | contribs)
Cleaned up the references. Cleaned up the text.
 
(22 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
A '''Barr Body '''is an inactivated. condensed X [[Chromosome|chromosome]] found in female cells.  
A Barr Body is an inactivated, condensed X [[Chromosome|chromosome]] found in female cells.  


Since X chromosomes are larger than [[Y chromosome|Y chromosomes]], they could potentially hold more genetic information. To ensure that X-linked gene product doses are kept similar between males and females, one of the [[X chromosome|X chromosomes]] in a female is crammed into a small space which condenses (the Barr Body). This results in the genetic information on the chromosome being inaccessible to proteins that cause gene transcription. This is called ''[[Dosage_Compensation_Mechanism|dosage compensation]]''.  
Since females possess two X chromosomes and males have one X chromosome and a [[Y chromosome|Y chromosomes]], Barr bodies are essential to regulate the amount of X-linked gene product being transcribed. To ensure that X-linked gene product doses are kept similar between males and females, one of the [[X chromosome|X chromosomes]] in a female becomes very condensed - the Barr body. This results in the genetic information on the chromosome being inaccessible to proteins that cause [[Gene|gene]] transcription. This is called [[Dosage Compensation Mechanism|dosage compensation]].  


Inactivation of the X chromosome is random and occurs at an early point of development.  
[[X chromosome Inactivation|X chromosome Inactivation]] is random and occurs at an early point of development, however, about 10% of the genes on the inactivated X chromosome avoid being silenced<ref>Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K and Walter P (2008) Molecular Biology of The Cell, 5th edition, New York: Garland Science</ref>.  


The number of Barr bodies in a cell is one less than the number of X chromosomes. For example:  
The number of Barr bodies in a cell is one less than the number of X chromosomes. For example:  


*In a normal female with the [[genotype|genotype]] 46XX , the number of Barr bodies would be 1.  
*In a normal female with the [[Genotype|genotype]] 46XX , the number of Barr bodies would be 1.  
*In a normal male with the genotype 46XY, the number of Barr bodies would be 0.
*In a normal male with the genotype 46XY, the number of Barr bodies would be 0.


However in a male with [[Klinefelter syndrome|Klinefelter's syndrome and]] the genotype 47XXY, the number of Barr bodies would also be 1<ref>Page 262, Hartl D.L and Ruvolo M (2012) Genetics, Analysis of Genes and Genomes, 8th edition, USA: Jones and Bartlett</ref>.<br>  
However in a male with [[Klinefelter syndrome|Klinefelter's syndrome]] (where the genotype is 47XXY), the number of Barr bodies would also be 1<ref>Page 262, Hartl D.L and Ruvolo M (2012) Genetics, Analysis of Genes and Genomes, 8th edition, USA: Jones and Bartlett</ref><ref>Alberts, B. Johnnson, A. Lewis, J. Raff, M. Roberts, K and Walter, P. (2008) Molecular Biology of The Cell 5th Edition, New York:Garland Science. (page 473)</ref>.
 
To work out the number of Barr bodies an individual has the formula: Xn-1 can be used.
 
=== Lyonization  ===
 
Lyonization was discovered by British geneticist Mary Lyon when she found that chromosome sets with more than one X chromosomes undergo X-inactivation. She consequently came up with the Lyon Hypothesis of which her discovery is based.
 
This is a conservative method in which an X chromosome is shut down, in order to form a Barr body. Lyonization is the process where the chromosome is compacted into a small, dense Barr body. Here most of the genes are inactivated so that they are not transcribed.
 
Lyonization allows human females to have the usual 'dosage' of genes as males; males already have fewer genes due to the presence of the Y chromosome which is smaller than the X chromosome; females have two XX chromosomes<ref>X-inactivation. Khan Academy. https://www.khanacademy.org/science/high-school-biology/hs-classical-genetics/hs-sex-linkage/a/x-inactivation</ref>.
 
The Lyon Hypothesis:
 
*Inactivation is random at an early point in development
*Once inactivated, all progeny cells have the same X-chromosome inactivated
 
=== '''Non-coding RNA and X inactivation''' ===
 
The inactivation process is controlled by 2 genes: Xist and Tsix ( which if you noticed are the opposites of each other)
 
Xist is only expressed in cells containing 2 X chromosomes( females) and it has the ability to recruit various silencing proteins to mark the future non-coding X chromosome<ref>Penny, G. D., et al. Requirement for Xist in X chromosome inactivation. Nature 379, 131–137 (1996) doi:10.1038/379131a0</ref>.


=== Reference  ===
=== Reference  ===


<references />
<references />

Latest revision as of 06:51, 5 December 2018

A Barr Body is an inactivated, condensed X chromosome found in female cells.

Since females possess two X chromosomes and males have one X chromosome and a Y chromosomes, Barr bodies are essential to regulate the amount of X-linked gene product being transcribed. To ensure that X-linked gene product doses are kept similar between males and females, one of the X chromosomes in a female becomes very condensed - the Barr body. This results in the genetic information on the chromosome being inaccessible to proteins that cause gene transcription. This is called dosage compensation.

X chromosome Inactivation is random and occurs at an early point of development, however, about 10% of the genes on the inactivated X chromosome avoid being silenced[1].

The number of Barr bodies in a cell is one less than the number of X chromosomes. For example:

  • In a normal female with the genotype 46XX , the number of Barr bodies would be 1.
  • In a normal male with the genotype 46XY, the number of Barr bodies would be 0.

However in a male with Klinefelter's syndrome (where the genotype is 47XXY), the number of Barr bodies would also be 1[2][3].

To work out the number of Barr bodies an individual has the formula: Xn-1 can be used.

Lyonization

Lyonization was discovered by British geneticist Mary Lyon when she found that chromosome sets with more than one X chromosomes undergo X-inactivation. She consequently came up with the Lyon Hypothesis of which her discovery is based.

This is a conservative method in which an X chromosome is shut down, in order to form a Barr body. Lyonization is the process where the chromosome is compacted into a small, dense Barr body. Here most of the genes are inactivated so that they are not transcribed.

Lyonization allows human females to have the usual 'dosage' of genes as males; males already have fewer genes due to the presence of the Y chromosome which is smaller than the X chromosome; females have two XX chromosomes[4].

The Lyon Hypothesis:

  • Inactivation is random at an early point in development
  • Once inactivated, all progeny cells have the same X-chromosome inactivated

Non-coding RNA and X inactivation

The inactivation process is controlled by 2 genes: Xist and Tsix ( which if you noticed are the opposites of each other)

Xist is only expressed in cells containing 2 X chromosomes( females) and it has the ability to recruit various silencing proteins to mark the future non-coding X chromosome[5].

Reference

  1. Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K and Walter P (2008) Molecular Biology of The Cell, 5th edition, New York: Garland Science
  2. Page 262, Hartl D.L and Ruvolo M (2012) Genetics, Analysis of Genes and Genomes, 8th edition, USA: Jones and Bartlett
  3. Alberts, B. Johnnson, A. Lewis, J. Raff, M. Roberts, K and Walter, P. (2008) Molecular Biology of The Cell 5th Edition, New York:Garland Science. (page 473)
  4. X-inactivation. Khan Academy. https://www.khanacademy.org/science/high-school-biology/hs-classical-genetics/hs-sex-linkage/a/x-inactivation
  5. Penny, G. D., et al. Requirement for Xist in X chromosome inactivation. Nature 379, 131–137 (1996) doi:10.1038/379131a0